VR - HTC, Oculus, VIndex, czy co?

[Stary Karczmarz]

Na pytanie czy używałem Reverba chyba nie muszę odpowiadać ale twoja opinia niesie ze sobą ten sam poziom informacji co inne opinie dlatego przytoczę co nieco:

Cytat:Well, I am starting to have a preference now.
This afternoon I have been playing with the Index about 1 hour, same QMB in spring Kuban sea at sunrise (and also night), doing exactly the same all time: with the Spitfire killing 110s, the train and ships.
 
Just after that, I switched to the Reverb and I quickly noticed several worse things in the Reverb:
- FOV: The vertical FOV of Reverb is much much smaller than Index, and also the horizontal. I really liked the FOV of the Index and I was missing that after the switch. Larger FOV is really useful.
- Sweet spot: I noticed that very quickly without looking for it. In the Reverb the images gets blurred and chromatic aberration as your eyes move from enter of view. Period.
- Performance: I still have not run the tests, but with 140%SS at Index at 80Hz (12.5 million pixels), the performance is much better in the Index than in the REverb with 188%SS at 90Hz (9.5 million pixels). I know that running at 80 helps to the CPU and GPU, but it really doesn´t explain why the performance is so much worse in the Reverb. So performance wise it is better the Index
- Foam cushion: The synthetic leather  doesn´t allow to breath the skin, and if your skin is hot you will get some fogging on the lenses.
 
But the curious thing is that after 15 minutes playing with the REverb, the smaller FOV, worse sweet spot, and even worse performance was less a less annoying. So I continued playing for another 45 minutes and enjoyed the great view on the center. Then I changed the SS to 140% to have better performance, but the image was a bit less sharp and clear.
 
Then I switched again to the Index for 30 minutes and in the initial moments I quickly realize that THE INDEX IS STARTING TO BE MY FAVOURITE HEADSET!!!
 
Why?
1.(40%) bigger FOV is GREAT (I already lost a FOV portion going from Pimax to Index, but I am not ready to lose more FOV).
2.(40%) bigger Sweet spot is GREAT. This together with the bigger FOV gives you a better feeling of presence in the scene.
3.(20%) Better comfort. I have been learning to to adjust the top strap with the right pressure in the back wheel. So, I feel better with Index.
 
The % indicate the weight of the reason. I didn´t include performance since this could be improved by acquiring a 9700K and a 2080Ti.

It is not a definitive choice, but just a preference for now.

Cytat:Spending a full 1.5 hours with a "virtual reality desk" sold me on this possibility, as my experience was honestly more comfortable with the Rift S than the Reverb. Rift S's screens don't suffer from the HP Reverb's uneven pixel distribution, peripheral smeariness, or blatant mura effects. And even though it doesn't have as pixel-rich of a "sweet spot," Rift S's pixel density is just rich enough to make a virtual 1440p monitor perfectly readable for a long period of time. Its refresh rate is fluid enough, and the panel's hefty subpixel resolution is adequate for VR eye comfort.

Jak już pisałem wcześniej, to że udało ci się trafić idealnie ze swoim IPD może być kluczem do niwelacji opisanych wyżej kwestii jednak nie znaczy to że one nie występują. To że Rift CV1 z marca 2016 nie może się równać do Acera z października 2017 i Reverba z marca 2019 to raczej nie powinno nikogo dziwić. Jednak nawet na tak starym sprzęcie o tak niskiej rozdzielczości jestem w stanie czytać tekst nawet na samej krawędzi FOV.